Hedge funds fail to wow in first half |
Date: Friday, July 6, 2012
Author: Svea Herbst-Bayliss, Reuters
Hedge funds have little to brag about halfway through 2012, with some of the
industry's biggest names reporting only small gains and trailing the benchmark
U.S. stock index by a wide margin. Paul Tudor Jones' flagship fund is up 1.59 percent through the third week in
June and David Einhorn's biggest portfolio is up 3.7 percent in the first half,
while Daniel Loeb told investors that his largest fund rose 3.9 percent during
the first six months of 2012, investors in the funds said. Compared with a year ago when many hedge funds were losing money, these
returns might be something to cheer, especially since they beat the benchmark
HFRX Global Index's 1.22 percent gain. But they pale measured against the 8 percent rise in the Standard & Poor's
500 stock index during the first half, with the $2.1 trillion industry failing
to wow at a time that public pension funds are increasingly turning to hedge
funds to shore up returns. The industry's underperformance may again raise questions whether it makes
sense for institutional investors to pay hefty fees to hedge funds when they can
earn better returns from low-cost index funds. Unlike most other portfolios,
hedge funds take a management fee plus a performance fee that is often 20
percent or more. EUROPE HURTS AGAIN Europe's seemingly endless debt crisis is getting much of the blame for the
year's anemic returns, but concerns about U.S. growth and how China will perform
are also making for uncertain trading conditions, experts said. With the steady stream of European news making for what traders are calling
excessive volatility in the short term, hedge fund managers betting on big
events are having a tougher time, experts added. "People are over-managing their positions," said Peter Rup, chief executive
and chief investment officer at Artemis Wealth Advisors, saying that funds moved
to short positions only to see those turn against them when markets rebounded
after having tumbled. So-called global macro funds that bet on big interest rate and currency
movements were the worst performers during the first half, dipping into the red
for the year thanks to currency trading losses in late June. Brevan Howard's flagship fund was off 3 percent halfway through June, an
investor in the fund said. Robert Gibbins' Autonomy Capital has delivered strong
gains, however, climbing 3.4 percent in June and 8 percent for the year, an
investor in the fund said. BRIGHT SPOTS There were other bright spots as well, with some managers who specialize in
selecting stocks making savvy picks and some managers specializing in credit
also performing well. Leon Cooperman's Omega Advisors Inc was up 10 percent in the first half,
benefiting from its long-time investment in student lender Sallie Mae, whose
shares have rebounded recently. Marcato Capital Management, founded by Mick McGuire after he left Bill
Ackman's Pershing Square Capital Management, jumped 12.7 percent in the first
half. Andor Capital Management, run by technology investor Dan Benton, who recently
came out of retirement, is up 6 percent, while Steven Cohen's SAC Capital
Advisors, one of the industry's most closely watched funds, was up 5.2 percent
in the first half. Boaz Weinstein's Saba Capital, which took the other side of some of the
trades that resulted in huge losses for JPMorgan Chase & Co was up 2.3 percent
through the third week of June. Blue Mountain, another fund that also made money
on the other side of JPMorgan's failed trades, was up 9.54 percent through the
third week of June, a person familiar with the numbers said. Some global fixed income strategies also worked for managers, with Brian
Taylor's Pine River Capital Management attracting positive attention. Its Pine
River Fixed Income fund, managed by Steve Kuhn, is up 13.76 percent this year
while its Pine River fund, managed by Aaron Yeary, is up 9 percent. And Kenneth Griffin, another one of the industry's biggest players, again put
up strong numbers when Citadel's main funds notched a 9 percent increase in the
first half. WINNERS NO MORE There are losers as well, including the two men who made the most betting
against the subprime mortgage market. Philip Falcone, now being sued by
financial regulators and often slow in releasing his numbers, told investors his
Harbinger II fund was off 33 percent during the first five months of 2012. John
Paulson's Advantage Plus fund was off 10 percent through the first five months
of the year.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.