
| Hedge funds cut BofA for Citi | 
      Date:  Tuesday, August 31, 2010
      Author: Maria Aspan and Joe Rauch, Reuters    
    
 Hedge fund manager Lee Ainslie swapped a bet on one big bank for another in 
the second quarter, selling off all his shares of Bank of America Corp(BAC.N) 
and investing in Citigroup Inc instead. Ainslie's Maverick Capital was joined by a number of other top hedge funds 
that shifted dollars away from BofA and toward Citi in the quarter, potentially 
signaling a shift in fortunes for the two financial service giants. Shares of BofA have so far recovered far better from the 2008 market crash. But the Charlotte, North Carolina-based lender's greater reliance on 
U.S.-based customers may now be a disadvantage in light of the weaker U.S. 
economic picture and tighter financial regulations, some analysts and investors 
said. "Globally, there's far greater opportunity for Citigroup than for Bank of 
America," said Bill Fitzpatrick, analyst at Optique Capital Management. (For a chart comparing BofA and Citi domestic and global business and their 
potential revenue losses due to new credit rules, see
link.reuters.com/nug57n.) The shifting sentiment was clear in the second quarter "Smart Money" survey 
compiled by Thomson Reuters from securities filings of the portfolios of 30 of 
the biggest fundamentally-oriented hedge funds. Larry Robbins' Glenview Capital sold down some of its BofA position while 
adding to its Citi stake. Andreas Halvorsen's Viking Global Investors, Chris 
Shumway's Shumway Capital and Steve Mandel's Lone Pine capital all exited BofA. 
Bill Ackman's Pershing Square Capital and Thomas Claugus's GMT Capital took up 
new stakes in Citi.   U.S. UNCERTAINTY BofA share movements reflect investor worries about the U.S. economy, 
analysts said, as unemployment hovers near 10 percent and GDP growth is weak. One of every two U.S. households does business with BofA, whether through 
loans or deposits. Citigroup, in contrast, is much less exposed to U.S. consumers and 
regulations. It has only about 1,000 North American retail branches, compared to 
BofA's 6,000-plus U.S. branches. "Economic data is weak, joblessness is high, and we're all uncertain of the 
rules of the road going forward," said Adrian Cronje, chief investment officer 
at Atlanta-based wealth management firm Balentine. "Financial regulation itself 
is an incredible bill with impact that is not properly understood." Citigroup almost matches the overall number of loans and deposits at BofA, 
yet depends on North America for only about 37 percent of its deposits and 69 
percent of its loans. But roughly 80 percent of BofA's loans and deposits come 
from U.S. consumers, analysts said. BofA's consumer business could change dramatically under the new banking 
rules, including a provision that restricts the fees banks receive from 
processing debit cards. The provision will affect both companies, but BofA's U.S. debit business is 
more than 10 times bigger than Citigroup's. In July, BofA warned that it could 
lose $1.8 billion to $2.3 billion of its $2.9 billion annual debit processing 
revenues under the law. "From a regulatory perspective, Bank of America's much more impacted ... than 
Citigroup," said Michael Nix, portfolio manager with Greenwood Capital 
Associates.   REVERSAL OF FORTUNE The hedge funds' sales stand in contrast to the first quarter, when broader 
optimism about the U.S. economy and the banking sector's recovery pushed top 
investors to increase their holdings of BofA stock. Since then, "Citigroup's had a little more of a positive trajectory," said 
Anton Schutz, president of Mendon Capital Advisors. To be sure, both BofA and Citi are still top bets among many of the largest 
hedge funds. David Tepper's Appaloosa Management reduced positions in both BofA and Citi 
in the second quarter but still holds large stakes, as does John Paulson, who 
stood pat with his multibillion-dollar positions. BofA shares were still the No. 1 most-owned in the portfolios of the "Smart 
Money" 30 hedge funds for the quarter and remain attractive in the long-term, 
investors and analysts said. Citi was the second-largest position. Another factor aiding Citi shares in the short-term will likely be the 
winding down of the U.S. government's role as a major shareholder. The U.S. Treasury has whittled down its stake since April but still holds 
almost 18 percent. Its rolling share sales are due to end by mid-December, 
giving investors hope that Citi shares will bounce above today's low price 
levels. "Citi's stock will move out materially when the news comes out that the 
government is done," Schutz said.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.

 
  
 