Ottawa to send securities regulator bill to Supreme Court soon: Flaherty |
Date: Wednesday, May 5, 2010
Author: Investment Executive
Finance Minister Jim Flaherty says he will have a draft
bill on a new national securities regulator ready to send to Parliament
and for a Supreme Court reference in a matter of weeks.
Flaherty
has committed to seeking the Supreme Court’s judgment on whether Ottawa
has the constitutional power to enact such legislation after Quebec and
Alberta objected.
The issue is also going to court in Quebec,
where the provincial government, supported by Alberta, has challenged
Ottawa’s authority to intervene on what the two governments believe is
provincial jurisdiction.
Federal governments have sought to
create a national security regulator for years, but it has always ground
to a half over provincial sensitivities and suspicions the new national
office would be dominated by Ontario.
Flaherty, however, appears
to be closest to making the project come to reality.
Should it
obtain the green light from the top court, Ottawa says it can have a
national regulator up and running in three years even if Quebec and
Alberta decide not to join.
In March’s budget, Flaherty projected
that the draft bill would be tabled in Parliament this spring, and that
the Canadian Securities Transition Office would deliver an
organizational and administrative transition plan during the summer.
Monday’s statements suggest the project is on schedule.
Flaherty
said Monday the draft bill is actually just days from being completed
internally, and would be tabled in Parliament “in a matter of weeks.”
Speaking
to reporters and in a speech in Cambridge, Ont., Flaherty gave another
reason why a national regulator -- as opposed to the current system of
13 separate provincial and territorial offices -- is needed.
The
minister said his government is unable to act as the U.S. has done in
investigating and charging Goldman Sachs with fraud in how it sold and
packaged certain securities. Other countries, in particular Britain and
Germany, have also said they would look at how the investment firm
operated within their jurisdictions.
“This is one of the
challenges I have in the Canadian situation,” he told reporters. “We
have Canadian securities regulators now that are provincial and so it’s a
provincial responsibility.”
Still, he said he would be surprised
if the Ontario Securities Commission “was not engaged” in the subject.
COURTESY INVESTMENT EXECUTIVE/CANADIAN PRESS