Japanese investors cautious on distressed assets |
Date: Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Author: Jame DiBiasio, Asian Investor
Domestically there are
concerns about creditor protection, while overseas there is wariness
towards hedge funds but more interest in private equity.
Japanese
limited partners (LPs) and institutions are watching the
distressed-asset market but not yet committing large amounts of capital. "We expect to see more corporate distressed situations worldwide,"
says Hideya Sadanaga, deputy general manager of credit and alternative
investments at Nippon Life Insurance. Seiji Murakata of the Development Bank of Japan's fund investment
group adds: "There should be some chances" in corporate restructuring
plays, despite the current high level of valuations. They made their remarks yesterday at a conference on distressed and troubled asset investing in Tokyo, organised jointly by AsianInvestor and FinanceAsia. Sadanaga says private equity funds are the best way to access such
opportunities. Japanese pension funds, insurance companies and other
institutions have had large exposures to hedge funds, mainly via funds
of funds. These funds of funds often had distressed strategies in their
portfolio, but didn't carve out special liquidity conditions and
subsequently refused to return capital to investors last year when
markets panicked. Veryan Allen, whose firm Allen Investment Advisors provides
alternative investment advice to Japanese institutions, says the easy
money was made in the 2009 rally, but lucrative opportunities remain.
"This year has been great for distressed debt beta," he says. "Next
year will be a great year for those managers that have demonstrated the
ability to add value." Allen sees a role for Japanese investors to invest directly with
single-strategy distressed hedge funds, provided LPs agree to at least
a three-year lock-up of capital, and preferably alongside other LPs
making the same commitment. Multistrategy hedge funds trying to add
illiquid plays to their broader products may struggle to raise new
money. However, Murakata says the cycle in distressed is still shorter than
most traditional private-equity funds, and investors can expect to get
their money back within three years. "You need a mid- to long-term focus, which is hard to have if you're running a hedge fund strategy," says Nippon's Sadanaga. One problem for Japan's would-be investors is that they only get to
see the very big PE funds that come through Tokyo. Therefore they miss
out on the mid-sized players and boutiques in the US and Europe that
may have attractive, high-return strategies. Big financial institutions
such as Nippon Life can get around this by outsourcing manager
selection to overseas offices in places like New York. Another challenge is image. Murakata says the concept of distressed
investing is too often blurred with 'vulture investing', and many
institutions in Japan don't appreciate its role in helping to turn
around troubled companies. A third issue is risk appetite, which is only recovering slowly.
Given the heavy exposure among many Japanese institutions to funds of
hedge funds, they are often not yet ready to take new risk. One head of a Japanese bank's prop trading desk told AsianInvestor that
his firm has been forced to sell off much of its alternative exposures
full stop, including distressed assets. "We've become a distressed
asset!" he joked. Less dramatically, Nippon Life is watching the market, but is not
yet prepared to increase its allocation to such strategies, although
Sadanaga does say that commercial real estate, particularly in the US,
may become a desirable arena. Allen says: "Investors are aware of the opportunity globally, but
you won't see big flows from Japan in the next six months. However,
distressed investing is a genuine source of alpha, not a repackaged
source of beta, so over the coming two or three years there will be
steady investments into this area." There is also a domestic distressed story. Hong Kong-based hedge
fund Pacific Alliance has so far made several deals in Japan acquiring
convertible bonds from large real-estate managers, including Reits, or
refinancing such assets. He says the firm has a pipeline to close this
year that could hit $200 million. "The process is frustrating and opaque, but the data on the
underlying assets is very robust," says Anthony Miller, chief executive
of Pacific Alliance Japan, who joined the firm earlier this year. Pacific Alliance also hired four distressed specialists from Deutsche Bank in Hong Kong last month. Restructurings in Japan are not driven by creditors, as they are in
the US and other jurisdictions. Recent deals, such as that involving
Aiful, have seen courts allow companies to continue activity under
restructuring, with an appointed trustee that controls what information
about the company is made public or given to creditors. Under this arrangement, management, labour, government and other
perceived stakeholders work out an understanding that is then usually
presented to creditors as a take-it-or-leave-it proposition. In theory,
creditors are assured of getting their coupons paid, but there have
been cases where they were forced to swallow haircuts. Moreover, there is no precedent yet in Japan as to whether such
events constitute a default for holders of credit-default swaps (CDSs).
"There is the potential to kill the entire Japanese CDS market," one
institutional investor from the audience told AsianInvestor. That said, while the process is frustrating and takes a very long
time, it still works, and the rules are followed. "Communications via
the trustee are commercial and realistic," says Peter Hammond, director
of Citi's institutional recovery management team in Asia. And in a few cases, creditors have been able to band together to
veto plans forwarded by trustees, resulting in liquidation, says
Hideyuki Sakai, managing partner at law firm Bingham McCutchen Murase,
Sakai Mimura Aizawa.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.